9-11 Review

Forensic Analysis Hub for 9/11 Evidence & Cover-Up Documentation

9-11 Review systematically dismantles the official narrative through three forensic pillars: The Attack and Cover-Up documents physical anomalies like explosive WTC collapses; Means, Motive, and Precedent analyzes government capabilities and historical false-flag operations; while Information Warfare exposes disinformation tactics. The platform emphasizes peer-reviewed findings including the 2009 identification of super-thermite explosives in WTC dust, directly challenging NIST conclusions.

History & Unique Value

Founded alongside early truth movements, 9-11 Review emerged as a centralized repository for suppressed evidence, collaborating with researchers like Michael C. Ruppert. It distinguishes itself through rigorous debunking of skeptic literature—including critiques of Terry Allen's Straw Man Attack and the NIST WTC 7 Report—while maintaining focus on institutional credibility gaps. This methodology aligns with current demands like Senator Ron Johnson's 2025 call for hearings on Building 7's controlled demolition.

Success & Relevance (2025)

• Policy Influence: Fuels bipartisan investigations including 2025 Senate Homeland Security hearings demanding new scrutiny of WTC collapses.

• First Responder Advocacy: Supports the New York Fire Department's 23-year campaign for justice, amplifying suppressed testimonies from Ground Zero.

• Scientific Authority: Cited in academic studies of transparency failures; its nano-thermite analysis remains pivotal in technical debates.

• Cultural Impact: Addresses growing public skepticism where 160 million Americans question official accounts (Chapman University, 2023).

How You Can Help

Access their complete evidence repository and research archives:

🔗911review.com

9/11 Truth Organizations